WebMar 17, 2024 · Even though our briefs tend to focus on disputed areas of law, where the answer to a particular legal question is not clear cut, we have earned a 12-0-1 record, with 11 cases still pending, in the briefs that we filed in calendar year 2024. Our briefs have covered a range of issues in a range of courts supporting a range of outcomes. Web"Whoever shall steal, embezzle, or knowingly apply to his own use, or unlawfully sell, convey, or dispose of, any ordnance, arms, ammunition, clothing, subsistence, stores, money, or other property of the United States, furnished or to be used for the military or naval Page 267 service, shall be punished as prescribed in sections 80 and 82-86 of …
MORISSETTE v. UNITED STATES. Supreme Court US Law
WebBrief Fact Summary. Defendant was a junk dealer who took old bomb casings that had been lying unused at an Air Force practice bombing range and sold them for a profit. Defendant was subsequently indicted and convicted of violating a statute that made it a crime to … Citation22 Ill.308 F.2d 307, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 352 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Brief Fact … Citation498 U.S. 192, 111 S. Ct. 604, 112 L. Ed. 2d 617 (1991) Brief Fact Summary. … WebAnswer: Yes. Conclusion: The court concluded that the restriction on the scope of cross-examination was a violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The district court abused its discretion when it ruled that Figueroa could not cross-examine the witness about his swastika tattoos. how to make nail polish rings
Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994) - Justia Law
WebBalint, 258 U.S. 250 (1922), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Study Aids. By product. Case Briefs (view casebooks) ... From our private database of 37,800+ case briefs... United States v. Balint. United States Supreme Court. 258 U.S ... WebBrief Fact Summary. Defendant Staples was convicted under the National Firearms Act, which criminalizes the possession of a weapon that is capable of automatically firing. Defendant argued that he did not know that the gun would fire automatically. Synopsis of … WebMorissette v. United States Supreme Court of the United States, 1952 342 U.S. 246. Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary. A junk dealer took bomb casings, which had been laying in the open and were rusting, from an Air Force bombing range. ... These cases do not fit neatly into any of such accepted classifications of common-law ... how to make nails grow longer in 3 days